Regulatory Intelligence for Autonomous AI

How ready are you for the EU AI Act?

Get a real-time readiness score for your business. Know exactly where you stand, what needs to change, and how to get there before the deadline.

0
Months
0
Days
0
Hours

August 2026: Companies deploying high-risk AI systems must demonstrate full compliance or face penalties of up to 7% of global turnover.

The deadline is real. The gap is wide.

Example: a typical financial services firm before our structured compliance assessment.

Most organisations have no clear picture of their EU AI Act readiness. They rely on assumptions, incomplete audits, or generic checklists that miss the detail the regulation demands.

Verilance gives you a single, defensible compliance score grounded in a structured analysis of your AI systems against the full scope of the Act.

  • Compliance scoring across all relevant obligations
  • Classification of your AI systems by risk tier
  • Gap analysis mapped to specific regulatory articles
  • Prioritised remediation with clear ownership
  • Evidence framework for demonstrating compliance

Why Verilance exists

AI has moved from experiment to industrial infrastructure - and the regulation has caught up. Verilance was built for the organisations that need to prove their AI systems are operating legally, not tomorrow, but right now.

Our mission

Turn legal rules into operational instructions for software and organisations. We convert regulation into machine-readable guardrails that autonomous agents and traditional AI systems can actually follow.

What we do

We are the regulatory reasoning engine above your existing governance stack. ServiceNow tells you what AI systems exist. Verilance tells you whether they are behaving legally - and produces the evidence to prove it.

Why now

Core EU AI Act obligations take effect on 2 August 2026. The Colorado AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 are not far behind. Static governance reports cannot keep pace. Real-time control infrastructure can.

“The AI agents drafting your emails, scoring your leads and personalising your content are not broken. They are working exactly as designed. That is the problem - they have no idea what regulatory background they are operating in. We built Verilance to give them one.”

Gerard Frith - Co-founder & Chief Product Officer, Verilance.ai

From uncertainty to a clear plan

Verilance turns EU AI Act compliance from an overwhelming obligation into a structured, scored, and actionable programme.

1

Classify

We inventory every AI system (packaged, custom, agentic, or shadow) and classify each against Annex III risk tiers.

2

Score

We produce a defensible compliance score for each system against the full obligations stack: risk management, technical documentation, human oversight, logging, transparency.

3

Plan

A prioritised remediation roadmap mapped to specific articles, with clear owners, effort estimates, and evidence requirements.

4

Maintain

Our reasoning engine monitors agent behaviour against regulatory guardrails in real time, and updates constraints automatically as obligations evolve.

Built for regulated industries

The EU AI Act hits hardest where AI is already embedded in decision-making. That is where we start.

Financial Services

Banks, fintechs, insurers, and asset managers deploying AI in credit decisioning, fraud detection, customer interaction, and risk assessment.

Regulated Technology

SaaS platforms, AI vendors, and technology providers whose products are deployed in regulated environments across the EU.

Healthcare & Life Sciences

Organisations using AI in diagnostics, patient management, clinical workflows and HCP engagement where the Act classifies systems as high-risk.

Professional Services

Consultancies, legal firms, and advisory practices seeking a structured compliance assessment tool for their own clients.

A regulatory reasoning layer, not another questionnaire

Today's AI governance tools give you inventories, questionnaires and static reports. What you need is real-time control. That is what we built.

Regulatory reasoning engine

We encode regulatory requirements as structured knowledge and derive machine-readable compliance constraints for each agent, system and jurisdiction.

Cross-jurisdiction by design

EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001. Constraints are evaluated per-action, per-location - not by the lowest-common-denominator policy.

Runtime agent monitoring

Every agent action assessed against the relevant regulatory constraints, with deviations flagged and full audit trails back to specific articles.

Audit-ready evidence

Continuous logging produces the exact artefacts external regulators and internal audit teams require - not policies, but proof.

Change propagation

When the regulation updates, guardrails update. Your agents stay compliant across versions, vendors and deployments without a manual rewrite.

Fits your stack

API-first integration with ServiceNow, IBM, OneTrust, Archer and the GRC tools you already run - or our native AI asset register if you do not.

Common questions

Short, direct answers to the questions that come up most.

Does the EU AI Act apply to my UK or US business?

Yes, if your AI systems are placed on the EU market or their outputs are used in the EU - regardless of where your business is headquartered. The Act applies to UK organisations selling into or operating in the EU, and to US organisations with European customers or users.

Is this just about chatbots and generative AI?

Far from it. The Act defines systems by what they do, not what they are. Personalisation engines, targeting models, content generation tools, predictive analytics and scoring systems - including legacy AI trained years ago - all fall within scope. If it influences access, decisions, or outcomes, it is very likely in scope.

What are the real penalties for non-compliance?

Up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover - whichever is higher - per breach. For a €20bn organisation that is €1.4bn of exposure per incident. Early enforcement is expected to target high-profile high-risk systems.

Is compliance a one-time exercise?

No. Every scope change - a new market, a new model version, a new vendor - triggers reappraisal. Evidence has to be collected continuously. That is why structured, automated monitoring is the only scalable path: manual review breaks the moment your AI portfolio moves.

How is Verilance different from ServiceNow, OneTrust or IBM?

Those platforms tell you what AI systems exist and manage your governance workflow. Verilance sits above them, translating regulation into machine-readable guardrails and monitoring agent behaviour against those guardrails in real time. We complement rather than replace your existing GRC stack.

How long does a compliance assessment take?

4 weeks. We work with your compliance, IT and product teams to inventory your AI systems, classify them, score them against the obligations, and deliver a prioritised remediation roadmap with clear ownership and evidence requirements.

What about autonomous AI agents specifically?

Autonomous agents are where Verilance is strongest. You cannot classify an agent once and walk away - it chains actions at runtime. We monitor every action against the regulatory constraints that apply to its context, flag deviations, and produce audit evidence back to specific articles.

Find out where you stand

The EU AI Act deadline will not move. Your compliance readiness can. Get your score and a clear plan in 4 weeks.

Share a few details and one of our team will respond within one business day to arrange your assessment kick-off.

Four-week assessmentFrom kick-off to defensible compliance score
No procurement commitmentStart with an assessment - upgrade only if it is useful
By submitting this form, you agree that Verilance may use your details to respond to your inquiry. See our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.